Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Executive Summary Exercise Assignment Instructions Overview This assignment provides you with the opportunity to apply wha - School Writers

Executive Summary Exercise Assignment Instructions Overview This assignment provides you with the opportunity to apply wha

Executive Summary Exercise Assignment Instructions

Overview

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to apply what you have learned in class to a real-world application in the field. This assignment should be a succinct overview of the concepts developed throughout the course in leadership and how they can be applied to help leaders make effective decisions.

Instructions

 

The Executive Summary Exercise Assignment is written for high-level decision-makers and those who may not have enough time to read a lengthy report in an organization.  The Executive Summary Exercise Assignment gives a thorough snapshot of the purpose, implications, recommendations, and any other essential information for a leader to make an informed decision.

Previously in class you completed a major research paper in the form of a leadership training proposal. Your Chief is impressed with the proposal and wishes to brief the City Manager and City Council on this proposal. The Chief would like for you to produce an executive summary for the City Manager/City Council presentation.

Your document will still have an APA compliant cover page.  No abstract is needed for this paper. If you have references you will need a reference page.

·       It is expected that your Executive Summary Exercise Assignment main body will be one page up to 10% of the length of your original report.

·       This assignment is required to be in current APA format.

·       It is expected that there will be very few (if any) references in this Executive Summary Exercise Assignment

·       While sources are not required, any research used should be scholarly research.

 

Here are some highlights of an executive summary:

·       They are short.  Executive summaries may run as much as 10% of the original length of the original report.  However, think in terms of a typical executive summary of one to two pages.

·       They are self-contained. Executive summaries are presented separate from the original report to a specific target audience. References to material contained in the main report are not needed as the decision-maker may not have the original report.  However, this must be mitigated if inherent danger or liability needing further explanation is in the original report. In this case the executive summary should point to original report specifics.

·       They are constructed in a series of connected paragraphs.  Many executive summaries with multi-paragraph sections often use sub-headings as a form of organization. The use of sub-headings, even in a short executive summary, allow a decision-maker to find key information.

·       They contain only the most important information about the project.  Focusing on significance, findings, strengths, weaknesses, drawbacks, measurements, and/or recommendations keeps the summary pithy.

·       They are written at the technical level of the audience.  If the audience is not familiar with jargon, acronyms, and other technical terms, do not include the terms or better explain the terms.  Again, the focus is on the decision-makers.

·       They are typically the last report to be written. All the key points cannot be included if the original report is incomplete. 

·       There are many correct formats.  As stated above, the page length may vary from one to two pages up to 10% of the original report.  The format may or may not have sub-section headings.  Remember the job is to create a brief, informative, quick to review, document with all of eh salient points of the project for the decision-maker. 

·       Look at several methods of executive summaries and the Executive Summary Exercise Grading Rubric. Then, choose the most appropriate format.               

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.  

CJUS 730

Executive Summary Exercise Assignment Instructions

Overview

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to apply what you have learned in class to a real-world application in the field. This assignment should be a succinct overview of the concepts developed throughout the course in leadership and how they can be applied to help leaders make effective decisions.

Instructions

The Executive Summary Exercise Assignment is written for high-level decision-makers and those who may not have enough time to read a lengthy report in an organization.  The Executive Summary Exercise Assignment gives a thorough snapshot of the purpose, implications, recommendations, and any other essential information for a leader to make an informed decision.

Previously in class you completed a major research paper in the form of a leadership training proposal. Your Chief is impressed with the proposal and wishes to brief the City Manager and City Council on this proposal. The Chief would like for you to produce an executive summary for the City Manager/City Council presentation.

Your document will still have an APA compliant cover page.  No abstract is needed for this paper. If you have references you will need a reference page.

· It is expected that your Executive Summary Exercise Assignment main body will be one page up to 10% of the length of your original report.

· This assignment is required to be in current APA format.

· It is expected that there will be very few (if any) references in this Executive Summary Exercise Assignment

· While sources are not required, any research used should be scholarly research.

Here are some highlights of an executive summary:

· They are short . Executive summaries may run as much as 10% of the original length of the original report. However, think in terms of a typical executive summary of one to two pages.

· They are self-contained . Executive summaries are presented separate from the original report to a specific target audience. References to material contained in the main report are not needed as the decision-maker may not have the original report. However, this must be mitigated if inherent danger or liability needing further explanation is in the original report. In this case the executive summary should point to original report specifics.

· They are constructed in a series of connected paragraphs . Many executive summaries with multi-paragraph sections often use sub-headings as a form of organization. The use of sub-headings, even in a short executive summary, allow a decision-maker to find key information.

· They contain only the most important information about the project. Focusing on significance, findings, strengths, weaknesses, drawbacks, measurements, and/or recommendations keeps the summary pithy.

· They are written at the technical level of the audience . If the audience is not familiar with jargon, acronyms, and other technical terms, do not include the terms or better explain the terms. Again, the focus is on the decision-makers.

· They are typically the last report to be written . All the key points cannot be included if the original report is incomplete.

· There are many correct formats . As stated above, the page length may vary from one to two pages up to 10% of the original report. The format may or may not have sub-section headings. Remember the job is to create a brief, informative, quick to review, document with all of eh salient points of the project for the decision-maker.

· Look at several methods of executive summaries and the Executive Summary Exercise Grading Rubric. Then, choose the most appropriate format.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.  

,

Soma-Pseudo

Police Department

2017 ANNUAL REPORT

Introduction

This report provides information related to Soma-Pseudo Police Department, a fictional agency, operational activities during calendar year 2017. During 2017, the SPD operated with 140 officers. The authorized staffing is 173 sworn police officers and 35 non-sworn personnel. Soma-Pseudo is 50 square miles and an estimated permanent residential population of 77,874. In that Soma-Pseudo serves as the hub of a new regional technology initiative. Additionally Soma-Pseudo has five institutions of higher learning and the City’s estimated daily work/school/recreational population grows to 110,000 or more.

Although Soma-Pseudo has received pressure from city administrators to become CALEA accredited, Soma-Pseudo PD has not sought CALEA accreditation.

Soma-Pseudo Police Department thinks of itself as a community policing organization. In this approach, Police Department employees work collaboratively with residents and other community partners toward attaining a common goal: a safe and vibrant community environment for everyone to enjoy. SPD’s community policing success is built upon having the right people in place: people who can overcome challenges; people who can effectively communicate and collaborate; people who can make and seize opportunities for positive achievement. This is the reason that maintaining a dedicated, engaged and experienced workforce must always remain is a SPD priority.

Once again, I want to thank the men and women who are the Soma-Pseudo Police Department for the hard work, the commitment and the creativity they bring to bear in providing effective public safety services within our diverse and growing community. I also want to thank those community members whom the SPD has found willing, ready and able to involve themselves in being part of the solution to community problems. All segments of our community working together is the dynamic that makes Soma-Pseudo a great place to live, work and visit.

May 15, 2017 Jeffery Cox, Chief of Police

SPD 2017 Annual Report

Mission, Vision, Values and Goals

Mission Statement

The Mission of SPD is To Protect and Serve

Vision Statement

SPD will Protect and Serve the Community

Crime in Soma-Pseudo – 2017

One of the hallmarks that most governments and citizens and many prospective residents look to in evaluating a community is crime and the perception of crime among residents. The Soma-Pseudo Police Department recognizes that crime control is one of our critical missions.

However, it is important to make the distinction between the totality of crime and the subset of crimes that are reported, and are therefore become known to the police. Although there are many factors that influence the reporting of crime, it is generally accepted that only a modest percentage of crime is ever reported to the police. The law enforcement community’s primary objective with regards to the collection and analysis of crime data is to provide a reliable set of crime statistics for criminal justice and law enforcement administration, operation and management, as well as providing an objective measurement and indication of the overall level of crime.

Crime Factors:

Historically, the causes and origins of crime have been the subject of investigation and research by many varied disciplines. Factors that are known to affect the volume and type of crime occurring include, but are not limited to, the following:

· Population density and degree of urbanization

· Variations in composition of the population, particularly youth concentration

· Stability of population with respect to residents’ mobility, commuting patterns, and transient factors

· Modes of transportation and highway system

· Economic conditions, including median income, poverty level, and job availability

· Cultural factors and educational, recreational, and religious characteristics

· Family conditions with respect to divorce and family cohesiveness

· Climate and weather

· Effective strength of law enforcement agencies

· Administrative and investigative emphases of law enforcement

· Policies of other components of the criminal justice system (i.e., prosecutorial, judicial, corrections, and probation).

· Citizens’ attitudes toward crime

· Crime reporting practices of the citizenry

Crime Reporting

In 2000, the majority of law enforcement organizations throughout the nation including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the State Police, and the Soma-Pseudo Police Department, switched from the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) system to the Incident Based Reporting (IBR) system. The IBR system utilizes 22 “Group A” offenses — involving 46 individual offense sub-categories – as the basis for calculating jurisdictional crime rates. Under the IBR system, all offenses are counted for each incident so that criminal justice agencies can more effectively and realistically track and document criminal incidents and violations.

The following chart outlines criminal offenses as defined by IBR reporting standards:

IBR “Group A” Offenses

IBR “Group B” Offenses:

1

Arson

1

Bad Checks

2

Assault Offenses

2 Curfew/Loitering/Vagrancy

3

Bribery

3

Disorderly Conduct

4

Burglary/Breaking and Entering

4 Driving Under The Influence

5

Counterfeiting/Forgery

5

Drunkenness

6

Property Damage / Vandalism

6 Family Offenses, Non-violent

7

Drug/Narcotics Offenses

7

Liquor Law Violations

8

Embezzlement

8

Peeping Tom

9

Extortion/Blackmail

9

Runaway Juveniles

10 Fraud Offenses

10 Trespass of Real Property

11 Gambling Offenses

11 All Other Offenses

12 Homicide Offenses

The number of Group A Offenses occurring in a jurisdiction determines that jurisdiction’s overall crime rate.

Only those Group B Offenses that are cleared by an arrest are reported under the IBR system.

13 Kidnapping/Abduction

14 Larceny/Theft Offenses

15 Motor Vehicle Theft

16 Pornography/Obscene Material

17 Prostitution Offenses

18 Robbery

19 Sex Offenses, Forcible

20 Sex Offenses, Non-Forcible

21 Stolen Property Offenses

22 Weapon Law Violations

SPD “Group A” Criminal Offenses Highlights 2012 – 2017

There were a total of 6,057 “Group A” offenses reported in 2012, 5,700 “Group A” offenses in 2013, 4,950 “Group A” offenses in 2014, 5,000 “Group A” offenses in 2015, 6,100 “Group A” offenses in 2016, and 6,350 “Group A” offenses in 2017.

Violent Crime 2012 – 2017

There were a total of 1,600 violent crimes reported in 2012, 1,400 violent crimes reported in 2013, 1,410 violent crimes reported in 2014, 1,570 violent crimes reported in 2015, 1,700 violent crimes reported in 2016, and 1,780 violent crimes reported in 2017.

Property Crime 2012 – 2017

(Arson, Burglary, All Larceny, Stolen Vehicles)

There were 850 property crimes reported in 2012, 625 property crimes reported in 2013, 550 property crimes reported in 2014, 625 property crimes reported in 2015, 690 property crimes reported in 2016, and 755 property crimes reported in 2017. Unlike many communities in America, Soma-Pseudo has significantly more violent crime than property crimes.

Drug Crime 2012 – 2017

There were 740 drug crimes reported in 2012, 775 drug crimes reported in 2013, 860 drug crimes reported in 2014, 945 drug crimes reported in 2015, 1010 drug crimes reported in 2016, and 1025 drug crimes reported in 2017. A component of reported drugs crimes is the proactive arrests of officers. When officers make numerous drug arrests the rate of drug crimes seems to go up.

Locality Crime Rate Comparison

The national Incident-Based Reporting (IBR) System defines a locality’s “crime rate” as the number of Group A offenses occurring per 100,000 population. This formula allows for crime rate comparison among localities with varying populations. For purposes of Soma PD, the actual number of crimes are shown.

The most recent Crime in the State publication from the Department of State Police reports the following (calendar 2013) crime rates for regional localities:

Soma-Pseudo 7,298.12 (population 77,376) ^

Chaulkville 7,024.43 (population 46,623) ^

Demonstration 6,902.34 (population 43,912) ^

Belkmont 5,500.76 (population 98,913) ^

Soma-Pseudo reasonably compares to other regional communities, both larger and smaller in relative population. Soma-Pseudo continues to be a safe and vibrant community, thanks to the collaborative efforts of the SPD and our many community partners – individuals, businesses, neighborhoods and other agencies.

^ Locality population figures provided by the State Police

Annual Arrests by SPD

Calls for Service

A “Call for Service” (CFS) is defined as any incident in which police officer response or intervention is either requested by a complainant or initiated by an officer. CFS include criminal and non-criminal matters. 2017 CFS average: 103 calls/incidents per day.

Criminal Case Clearance Rate by SPD

SPD 2017 Annual Report

16

Traffic Safety

These numbers include the number of reportable accidents handled by SPD officers during 2017. Accidents must include an injury or $1,500 in combined property damage to be reportable.

Number of Accidents

1,683

Number of Pedestrian Accidents

17

Number of Injury Accidents

282

Number of Injuries

443

Number of Fatality Accidents

3

Number of Fatalities

3

Total Estimated Property Damage

$6,675,018

Traffic Enforcement

SPD officers issued 9,979 citations for traffic violations during 2017. The following table charts SPD’s top 10 traffic enforcement offense categories for the year.

Traffic Infraction

Citations Issued in 2017

1ST

SPEEDING

1,901

2ND

EXPIRED STATE REGISTRATION

1,092

3RD

EXPIRED / NO STATE INSPECTION

1,090

4TH

DRIVING UNDER REVO/SUSPENSION

774

5TH

SEAT BELT VIOLATION

611

6TH

FAIL TO OBEY HIGHWAY SIGN

424

7TH

RECKLESS DRIVING

412

8TH

FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY

357

9TH

FAIL TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY

324

10TH

DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT

168

Complaint Investigation

Complaints made against SPD employees are classified into two general types: 1) allegations of inappropriate employee performance or demeanor, or 2) allegations of employee misconduct — to include misuse of force, employee violation of law or significant violation of policy. All allegations of misconduct, inappropriate performance or demeanor are thoroughly investigated and documented by supervisory staff members.

Forty-Six allegations of misconduct were filed against SPD employees during 2017. In comparison, 34 allegations of employee misconduct were filed during 2016, 22 during 2015, 26 during 2014, and 20 during 2013.

Investigative findings related to 2017 allegations of misconduct were as follows:

23 allegations were determined to be “sustained” (50% of total allegations)

10 allegation was determined to be “non-sustained” (21% of total allegations)

13 allegations were determined to be “unfounded” (28% of total allegations)

Thirty-eight performance or demeanor complaints were filed against SPD employees during 2017. In comparison, 31 performance or demeanor complaints were filed during 2016, 18 during 2015, and 26 during 2014.

Investigative findings related to 20147allegations of inappropriate employee performance or demeanor was as follows:

18 complaints were determined to be “sustained” (47% of total allegations)

8 complaints were determined to be “non-sustained” (21% of total allegations)

3 complaints were determined to be “exonerated” (8% of total allegations)

8 complaints were determined to be “unfounded” (21% of total allegations)

1 complaint was withdrawn by the reporting person (3% of total allegations).

Budget Information

The Soma-Pseudo Police Department annual operational budget is one component of City of Soma’s annual General Fund budget. The City and SPD fiscal year extends from July 1 through June 30. The SPD’s operational budget is comprised of two component budgets – Police Operations and Firing Range Operations.

The SPD amended budget for FY2017 (the current fiscal year) is $15,536,685. Of that total, $13,377,868 is committed to personnel costs for salaries and benefits; the remaining $2,158,817 covers all other operational costs. Personnel costs constitute approximately 86% of the SPD’s FY17 budget.

Use of Force Review*

Among the most complex of a law enforcement officer’s duties is the responsibility to use force under law if and when required in the accomplishment of local government objectives. SPD policy defines a “use of force” as an application of physical force, OC spray, impact weapon, taser or means of potentially deadly force in performance of an officer’s duty.

During 2017, there were a total of 97 use of force incidents that involved 135 applications of force by individual officers. Multiple incidents involved either application of force by more than one officer, or a single officer applying more than one type of force to take a resisting arrestee into custody – for example, use of physical force in conjunction with use of a taser or of OC spray.

Every incident in which force is used by an SPD officer is investigated and documented by supervisory staff members. Use of force investigation is reviewed by the involved officer’s entire chain of command.

During 2017, LPD officers utilized force in a total of 97 out of 2,850 total arrest situations: this equates to officers using force in approximately 3.4% of all arrest situations. Viewed within the context of annual calls for service, officers utilized force in only 62 of 37,880 service call interactions with members of the public: this equates to use of force in only .2% (less than one percent) of these contacts. 2017 figures are slightly higher than historical use of force data.

Organizational Chart

Sworn Positions in SPD

Sworn Positions

Position

Authorized Strength

Actual Strength 2017

Chief

1

1

Deputy Chief

3

3

Captain

5

4

Lieutenant

10

8

Sergeant

25

23

Master Police Officer

38

23

Police Officer

91

78

Total

173

140

2017 Average Years of Police Service by Rank in SPD

Chief of Police

Chief Aide – Captain

Deputy Chief Uniform Division

Deputy Chief Investigative Division

Deputy Chief Support Division

Captain Patrol North

Captain Patrol South

Captain Investigative Division

Captain Interal Affairs

Budget Analyst

Lieutenant Property and Evidence

Lieutenant Fleet Maintenance

Property Crime

2012 Property Crime 850 2013 Property Crime 625 2014 Property Crime 550 2015 Property Crime 625 2016 Property Crime 690 2017 Property Crime 755

Drug Crimes

2012 Drug Crimes 750 2013 Drug Crimes 775 2014 Drug Crimes 860 2015 Drug Crimes 945 2016 Drug Crimes 1010 2017 Drug Crimes 1025

Total Arrests (2008 to 2017)

2008 Total Arrests 3500 2009 Total Arrests 3680 2010 Total Arrests 4250 2011 Total Arrests 4300 2012 Total Arrests 4650 2013 Total Arrests 4000 2014 Total Arrests 3500 2015 Total Arrests 3350 2016 Total Arrests 3200 2017 Total Arrests 2850

Call for Service 2008 to 2017

2008 Calls for Service 35655 2009 Calls for Service 37072 2010 Calls for Service 31730 2011 Calls for Service 30750 2012 Calls for Service 29990 2013 Calls for Service 32345 2014 Calls for Service 35550 2015 Calls for Service 36345 2016 Calls for Service 37200 2017 Calls for Service 37880

Case Clearance Rate All Crimes

2008 Clearance Rate 0.41 2009 Clearance Rate 0.41499999999999998 2010 Clearance Rate 0.38 2011 Clearance Rate 0.44 2012 Clearance Rate 0.45 2013 Clearance Rate 0.48 2014 Clearance Rate 0.46 2015 Clearance Rate 0.43 2016 Clearance Rate 0.41 2017 Clearance Rate 0.36

Years Service

Series 1 Chief Deputy Chief Captain Lieutenant Sergeant Master Police Officer Officer 38 34 28 14 7 6 2.5

Total Group A Crime

2012 Group A Total (per thousand) 6057 2013 Group A Total (per thousand) 5700 2014 Group A Total (per thousand) 4950 2015 Group A Total (per thousand) 5000 2016 Group A Total (per thousand) 6100 2017 Group A Total (per thousand) 6350

Thousands

Violent Crime

2012 Violent Crime 1600 2013 Violent Crime 1400 2014 Violent Crime 1410 2015 Violent Crime 1570 2016 Violent Crime 1700 2017 Violent Crime 1780

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?